triadaconsult.blogg.se

1. #INSTALL A WORLD OF WARCRAFT 1.12.1 CLIENT. MAC OS X#
2. #INSTALL A WORLD OF WARCRAFT 1.12.1 CLIENT. 64 BIT#
3. #INSTALL A WORLD OF WARCRAFT 1.12.1 CLIENT. DRIVER#

The client will only work with Patch 4.3.2 32-bit client already installed. Looking through the first few pages of the related forum post, most reviews are positive, as would be expected.

#INSTALL A WORLD OF WARCRAFT 1.12.1 CLIENT. MAC OS X#

īlizzard released the 64-bit client ( Patch 4.3.2 build 15211) for Windows and Mac OS X for Live servers in early 2012. Stubs related to WoW's User Interface should use.

#INSTALL A WORLD OF WARCRAFT 1.12.1 CLIENT. 64 BIT#

Eventually It's likely there will be a World of Warcraft 64 bit client, but Blizzard will have to find a use case for storing more than 2gb in memory at any one point.

#INSTALL A WORLD OF WARCRAFT 1.12.1 CLIENT. DRIVER#

Hardware vendors are going to eventually stop writing driver updates for your 32 bit OS and 64 bit is what the software companies are starting to focus on. In terms of which to buy, I'd go with 64 bit since you're not really going to get a long life out of your 32 bit OS whatever it may be.

The memory component is really only an issue if you're constrained and paging to disk. That and your GPU are the two system components that you're turning to slag. Honestly, if you want a performance boost the biggest bang for your buck would be a solid state disk that you have WoW loaded on. And since 64 bit addressing is slower, it's not a performance gain there. DirectX (unless built using the 64 bit SDK) has a limit on object sizes of 2gb, so there's no way you'll be getting any more memory use out of the system than you were before.

Wow utilizes DirectX like most other games out there. So architecturally memory access is slower in 64 bit systems (Since Microsoft uses PAE as the memory management standard for X86_64 and AWE was the standard for 32 bit systems (you could enable PAE to get the extra gig of ram on an XP system, but this didn't make you 64 bit.)Ħ4 Bit applications will be able to take advantage of the X86_64 instruction set, and 32 bit ones will require an "emulation layer" (that's not really what it does, but we'll pretend.) Further you will be able to address more of your memory for specific applications, and take advantage of 64 bit operations outside of WoW. AWE is essentially a 2 step process, PAE is a 3 step process. The biggest difference you're going to find is in memory addressing.ĪWE is used by 32 bit Windows Operating systems. In that case I would go with 64-bit myself, since there will be more and more software that takes advantage of it (and you might want to play crazier games that need more memory than WoW does). WoW should run great if you have a good enough graphics card to support the resolution and maxed options. That all said, if you're building a new computer this shouldn't be an issue at all.

The hardware requirements for Wow: Cataclysm state that only 2 GB of total memory is required, so having 4 GB in the system should be plenty. If you want a lot of other apps using memory, then you should probably go 64-bit with more than 4 GB RAM.Īgain, I can't see this being a problem. This should be enough for WoW and the rest of the system, depending on what you have running in the background. In fact it may be slower on a 64-bit OS Windows 7's WOW layer, which essentially translates between 32 and 64 bits, is naturally slower than native 32-bit Windows 7.Īs for the memory, a 32-bit OS generally only allows for 3-4 GB (see info for Windows). As such, running it in a 64-bit OS provides no benefit except possibly extra available memory. The World of Warcraft client is a 32-bit program. This is outdated now please see Ben's answer.